IR Filters covers a wider range of options than most drawings imply, and the differences between them decide both performance and price. This article compares the practical choices available for biometric and fingerprint recognition - substrate, coating process, thickness and tolerance - and shows where each trade-off pays off and where it does not.
IR Filters in Biometric and Fingerprint Recognition
In biometric and fingerprint recognition, that translates into a specific set of requirements rather than a general preference for quality. Biometric systems must separate the live signal from everything else in the scene, which makes spectral filtering the primary function of the optics. Fingerprint and iris systems work at defined wavelengths, often under near-infrared illumination, and a filter that leaks the wrong band will compromise recognition as surely as a dirty sensor.
Coating and deposition considerations
Dichroic IR-cut designs run from roughly twenty to sixty layers of alternating high- and low-index oxides, with the layer thicknesses controlling both the position and the steepness of the edge. Ion-assisted deposition is the standard process because it produces dense layers that do not shift with humidity - an unassisted coating can move several nanometers after a week in a humid room. The residual reflection in the visible band has to be managed, since a strong reflection produces the green or magenta glint familiar on poorly coated camera windows; broadband AR layers are usually added on top of the dichroic stack to suppress it. For Biometric and Fingerprint Recognition, also decide whether a hard, hydrophobic outer layer is required, because it changes both the durability and the price of the part.
What drives cost and lead time
Layer count is the main cost lever. A simple IR-cut stack is a routine chamber run; adding a broadband AR on the second surface, a hydrophobic top layer, or tightening the transition from 30 nm to 10 nm each adds chamber time, increases sensitivity to layer thickness error and reduces yield, so prices rise faster than the layer count suggests. Substrate grade and thickness matter less than expected, except for sapphire, which is materially more expensive in every respect. Size is the second lever: parts that fit comfortably inside the chamber's uniform zone cost far less per unit than parts that must be positioned at the edge, where thickness uniformity degrades. In Biometric and Fingerprint Recognition, the cheapest real saving usually comes from relaxing the angle specification rather than from changing the material.
Substrate and material selection
The substrate decides transmission, thickness and durability. B270 and D263T borosilicate are the standard carriers for camera and sensor windows: clear, dimensionally stable, and thin enough to laminate or to fit behind a lens. Absorptive blue glass is used where the NIR must be removed without an angle-dependent coating, and it can also be combined with a dichroic layer to sharpen the edge. Sapphire enters when the window must resist abrasion - handheld devices and outdoor instruments - and its hardness also brings a wider transmission band, out to about 4.5 micrometers. In Biometric and Fingerprint Recognition, the substrate is usually specified together with the cut-on wavelength, because the two interact: a dichroic edge deposited on a substrate with some intrinsic NIR absorption will read further blue than the same stack on clear glass.
How it compares with the alternatives
The direct alternatives to a coated IR filter are absorptive blue glass, an absorptive dye on a polymer film, and removing the band in software. Absorptive glass has the advantage of being angle-independent and rugged but adds thickness, weight and color cast. Films are cheap and thin, which suits consumer modules, but they degrade under UV and heat and cannot be used at elevated flux. Software correction reduces NIR bleed without any component at all, but it cannot recover information the sensor never resolved separately, and it fails entirely in single-channel or monochrome systems. For instruments, machine vision and outdoor imaging in Biometric and Fingerprint Recognition, a dichroic filter on a thin glass substrate continues to offer the best combination of edge sharpness, transmission and service life.
How IR filters works in practice
An IR filter removes a spectral band the sensor would otherwise record, and it does so in one of two ways. A dichroic filter reflects near-infrared light with a multilayer interference stack, so nothing is absorbed and the part stays cool; a blue or absorptive glass filter removes the same band by absorbing it in the bulk material. Dichroic designs give sharper edges, higher visible transmission and precisely tuneable cut-on wavelengths, but the edge moves with angle. Absorptive glass is angle-insensitive and cheap, but it is thicker, heavier and its cut-on is fixed by chemistry. In Biometric and Fingerprint Recognition, the choice usually comes down to how much of the field of view arrives off-axis: a narrow acceptance cone favors a dichroic design, while a wide-angle lens often needs an absorptive or a hybrid solution to avoid color shading across the frame.
Requirements specific to Biometric and Fingerprint Recognition
In biometric and fingerprint recognition, that translates into a specific set of requirements rather than a general preference for quality. Biometric systems must separate the live signal from everything else in the scene, which makes spectral filtering the primary function of the optics. Fingerprint and iris systems work at defined wavelengths, often under near-infrared illumination, and a filter that leaks the wrong band will compromise recognition as surely as a dirty sensor.
- Tight band-pass or IR-cut definition at the operating wavelength
- Scratch-resistant user-facing surface
- Stable behavior across a wide angle of incidence
- High transmission for low-power illumination
ISO/IEC 19794 context for biometric data quality, ISO 10110 drawings, and RoHS and REACH declarations.
Selection data at a glance
| Parameter | Typical value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| IR-cut cut-on | 630-700 nm | Tuned to the sensor response |
| Visible transmission | T ≥ 90 %, R ≤ 1 % | Average 420-620 nm |
| NIR blocking | OD2 - OD4 (1 % - 0.01 %) | 700-1100 nm |
| Edge steepness | 10-30 nm transition | Dichroic designs |
| Angle of incidence | 0-30 deg specified | Passband shifts blue with angle |
| Wavelength tolerance | ± 5 nm standard, ± 2 nm precision | Measured at stated AOI |
| Substrate | B270, D263T, blue glass, sapphire | Absorptive option removes NIR without angle shift |
| Thickness | 0.3-3 mm | 0.55 - 1.1 mm typical for camera windows |
| Environmental | Humidity, salt spray, abrasion tested | MIL-C-48497 / MIL-PRF-13830B |
Frequently asked questions
What cut-on wavelength should I specify?
Most silicon sensors need the cut-on between 650 and 680 nm, before the sensor's NIR response climbs. If the application also has an 850 nm illuminator nearby, tighten the blocking to OD3 and confirm the edge position against the source wavelength.
Why does my image look green at the corners?
That is angular shift. The dichroic edge moves toward shorter wavelengths as the angle of incidence increases, so off-axis rays lose blue light and the frame edges shift color. Solutions are a wider transition, an absorptive element, or moving the filter closer to the stop.
Is absorptive blue glass better than a dichroic coating?
It depends on the acceptance angle and the budget. Blue glass is angle-independent, robust and cheap, but thicker and less controllable in cut-on. A dichroic coating gives a sharper, tuneable edge in a thinner part, at the cost of angle sensitivity.
Need a quotation for ir filters?
Send your drawing, target specification or coating requirement and an optical engineer will reply within 24 hours with a price and a lead time.
Request a Quote Email an engineer